ISLAM!
I just wanted to share with the readers of Moorish Mack the outcome of my "traffic" case today in "court". CASE DISMISSED! Yes Moors, dismissed. Not nolle prosequi (a formal notice by the plaintiff of abandonment of the suit) but DISMISSED! So, the STATE OF DELAWARE issued a SUMMONS to my ex rel. MACK A BUCKLEY for EXPIRED TAGS back in January, 2019. The car I was traveling in was not mine. And I did not know that the tag had expired. Neither did the owner who was out of the country at the time. When I was pulled over, and the policy enforcer told me that the tag was dead, I immediately got out of the vehicle to inspect for myself. Like I said, I had no idea. The vehicle I commonly drive is tagged and insured. I knew I couldn't fight the charge on the side of the road, so I complied with the enforcer so I could be on my way. I already knew before he came back with the "summons" that I was going to "court". The first thing I noticed was the fine when he came back with the summons (suit). It was for 142 notes. I looked at him and asked him was he for real. I explained that I was traveling, but I did not know that the car was not registered. And that if I did, I would have taken my own car to the store. He said that I would have to take it up with the court. I said I sure will. I said have a great day and pulled off. Naturally I'm pissed. At first I was thinking I'm just going to beat this in court, but after I seen the fine... I kind of lost my cool. My old "nigga brain" took over... (Lmao right now). The old me came back so fast I didn't catch it. Before I got home it was I ain't paying them sh*t. F*ck'em. Lol. I was King Kilmonger heated. It took me awhile, but I finally calmed down enough to the point where I started thinking with my common sense. I picked up the "ticket" / suit and everything started jumping off the paper. STATE OF DELAWARE in all caps. <--- Corporation. CHECK! My ex rel. WARDSHIP NAME in all caps. <--- Corporation. CHECK! Race: Black. <--- Slander. CHECK! Drivers' License #. <--- Commercial Instrument. CHECK! Class: D. <--- Shows commercial connection. CHECK! And as I start going down the summons, I notice that every entity on it is a corporation as well. Not one natural person. Even the policy enforcers name was spelled in all caps. FRAUD! FRAUD! FRAUD! Fast forward to March. Arraignment. I go. They spin me. A matter for the court. Okay. Fast forward today. I was so prepared for anything that they had for me.. I actually wanted to go before magistrate. I wanted to test my knowledge. Never even seen him. When the Deputy Prosecutor called my ex rel. to speak to me about the charge. I walked up. She immediately indicated to me that I had no Public Defender. I immediately told her that I didn't need or want anyone from the state to represent me. She said, "okay, you are charged with...", and I cut her off asap. I told her I was there by special appearance to clear up the matter. I stated that I was appearing in propia persona sui juris and not pro se. I pulled out my nationality card and showed it to her. I then stated that I was a Moorish American National citizen, and that my ID was an allodial document issued by my Moorish National Republic Federal Government... and I had her correct my name on the docket. I then told her that I was standing on my Moorish Zodiac Constitution, the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, and the United States Constitution to establish my standing. Afterwards, I pointed to the State of Delaware on the summons and told her that the State of Delaware was a corporation. and the name on the paper that looked like my ex rel. was not me, but a corporation. I then informed here that only a corporation can issue to another corporation. I then told her that even by the Delaware Code infraction that I had to KNOWINGLY operate the vehicle... which I knew they couldn't prove. She just stared at her paper and said, "but you aren't the owner of the car?" I said no. by this time the rest of the lawyers started to get close and stare. She looked up at me and said, "case dismissed. Your done." I said, "thank you" and walked out. To tell you the truth, I was super happy with the win, but I did want to see the magistrate. I wanted to test my knowledge lol, but hey... I'll take it. I got the result I wanted and now that's behind me. Time to move forward. I just wanted to share. Stand on your square Moors! You can do it too. ISLAM! M.B. Bey I.S.L.A.M.
0 Comments
Source: Real Sh!t JAYZ performs Nipsey Hussle "Tribute Freestyle" at Webster Hall. I am posting this because the message is so powerful... I didn't want you all to miss it. I going to help you listen to the music so you don't just skim through it. As usual, Mr. Shawn "JAYZ" Carter drops gem after gem. The opener... "Gentrify your own hood before these people do it / claim eminent domain and have your people move in...". He is saying, rebuild your community before "them people" do it... them people referring to the colonizers... we know this because his next line states to claim eminent domain. Which is... To tie it all together, in other RECLAIM YOUR LAND because your ancestors weren't JUSTLY COMPENSATED for the land... America. He not telling you to go back to Africa. He is telling you that America is home. How do we know this? In the next line he explains, "that's a small glance into what Nipsey was doing / for anybody still confused as to what he was doing...". Nipsey was buying up "the hood". The Marathon store, the building, he owned it. He employed people who couldn't get a job coming from prison. He was invested in various real states projects that would "gentrify" his "hood", and bring peace and prosperity back to the community. He was putting value back into the neighborhood. He was active in stopping senseless gang violence. Nipsey used his platform to raise awareness as he said on his song "Fucc Em" featuring Freeway & Cuzzy Capone, "n*ggas buying yachts / n*ggas buying jets / make me wanna buy the block / just to re-invest / hope my young n*ggas catch it fo' (before) its nothing left...". JAY then breaks down the plan of the colonizers. "The neighborhood designed to keep us trapped / they red-line us / so property declines / if you live by BLACKS / they depress the asset / then take the property back / IT'S A RUTHLESS... but a genius plan in fact..." Are you following the message? First, your land was stolen. Then after it was stole, they set up these "Social Constructs" i.e. the "projects" and turned communities into "hoods". Communities run themselves from top to bottom. They control the all the policies that dictate way of life from education to policing (enforcing policy). The TRAP! Does your "hood" or your "project" control the way of life for your people, or is the people's way of life dictated by an outside influence? You're not really a community if you are not in control. JAY then explains why the value of the land is calculated... it declines if you live by BLACKS. Those with study know that at law, black is colorable term... meaning that it is something that is purported to be real, appearing to be real although not necessarily true. If so called "black" people have no country of origin where their name is derived, THEY ARE NOT THAT PEOPLE because that people does not exist. Hence, the term BLACK as is refers to a person or a people is COLORABLE. So called negroes and blacks were Americans, therefore they can't be what they are purported to be. I know a lot of you are thinking that... it's not really that deep my brother... but it is. This is politics. The business that runs the planet. And while JAY may not be able to be say this directly, he does so through his art. I am just helping you see the picture. Here are some more "colorable" terms... so you can become familiar with what is and what isn't . You can't see the matrix if you don't know you're in one. Do you see that the laws that govern so called black people are colorable, and in fact COUNTERFEIT, FEIGNED, FRAUD?
JAY then brings it full circle by saying, "they depress the asset / and take the property back..." i.e. GENTRIFICATION... "It's a RUTHLESS... but a genius plan in fact." If you understand how the colonists used the pen to legally, but UNLAWFULLY steal the land inheritance (Real Estate) of the indigenous Americans by branding them negro, black, colored, Native American etc... (making them non-descend-able) and stealing the land through what is called escheat, then gentrification, and what happened and is happening makes a lot more sense. Study. There are so many layers to this message that it would take days to explain it. Hopefully, you are starting to see the picture. I could spend all day on this... but unfortunately I can not. Listen to the how JAY uses the crab in the barrel metaphor to explain some basic principles of life. The way he flips being "the plug" and having a plan... genius. All I can say from here is that... the messages are there. This is just a dope (connotatively speaking) 3 minutes of hip hop. You should listen. Islam. M.B. Bey I.S.L.A.M. Americans are "a native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or the copper colored [races], found here by Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America". By definition, anyone not born in America is not a native to America. The Act of 1870 (Naturalization Act of 1870) is the piece of legislation which allowed the colonists to designate themselves Americans, and the name be applied to all their descendants... even those who emigrated to other countries. Now if the Albion-European, in this case Englishmen, was such an American, why would it take such a specific piece of legislation to grant them a right they don't inherently possess? I'll wait... I think it's also important to note George Washington's take (highlighted in green) on being American. He said the name American must always exalt the pride of patriotism. Even George Washington had a false sense of nationalism because he was also an Englishmen by descent, but it shows you the transition in thinking as time progresses, which has much to do with the laws and legislation that was passed at the time. Larry Mitchell Hopkins was arrested Saturday April 20, 2019, by the FBI for posing as a border agent and detaining immigrants. Hopkins is a Trump supporter. He is being called a militia leader in the press, but not a "white nationalist". He only faces weapons charges and ammunition charges. No kidnapping? Hopkins suffers from a false sense of nationalism. Nationals are born, not naturalized. A "White" "National" as it pertains to a "White" "American" is really misnomer. A false sense of nationalism. To understand this better, you must understand the law and the history that goes along with it. When the Englishmen and Christian colonists came here in the late 16th, early 17th centuries, to the already established America, the continent consisting of North, Central, South, including what is now Canada and Mexico, and the adjoining Atlantic Islands, now the Caribbean Islands, they were not white, had no concept of being white, and they were never Americans. Play close attention to Bennett's usage of words when he says, "The word white (italicized), with it's burden of arrogance and biological pride, developed late in the century...". Bennett is hinting of the "White Man's Burden". Oxford cleverly promotes this false sense of nationalism by replacing English or Christian with the adjective white before colonizers, and not staying with the language of the times in it's definition. The use of European before colonies is another prime example if Oxford disguising the language of the Times. You will see below that the English used the word British American colonies.. not European. As we can see from the passage in Bennett's book (above) that the legal documents identified {whites} as Englishmen and/or Christians, and you will see below that Englishmen and/or Christians were proud to be such. * I put {white} in brackets because at the time Bennett's book was published in 1962, the acceptance of the still foreign Englishmen and/or Christian colonizers as European "white" people (false sense of nationalism) had already been ingrained into the global psyche. We must keep in mind that we are witnessing the "revisionist history" right before our very eyes. "Imposing Western civilization...", is incriminating evidence and proof of colonization, and "...on the black inhabitants..." is blatant gross misrepresentation of the aboriginal people. Those so called black inhabitants were Americans, and we aren't "black" people as we have been incorrectly classified to be in western civilization. Those same Americans were also re-branded Indians by Columbus (1492), which can not be because Indians come from India. The Spanish Inquisition nom de guerre (war name) was eventually applied to all the indigenous populations of America, but these people were not Indians. They were conquered Americans. So, we can see Indian is a misnomer as well. Note: The Mongoloid featured so called "Native" American that is so heavily depicted in revisionist American History as the original Indians are not what the majority of the aboriginal people of America looked like. These people crossed the Bering Strait and entered America in the early 1100's. They eventually settled the Northwest regions along the Pacific coast of what is now the states of Washington, Oregon, and California. They did intermingle with the indigenous Americans, but they are not originals. The image was switched so that so called black people never discover who they were. This is also the time, (1492) when Moors became "black" derived from the Spanish word "negro" or "negrito" meaning black... (see the negro connection now)... which is also a misnomer applied to the indigenous Americans, of a dark complexion. They were not "black" people. They were not Christians, negroes, nor Indians. For example, the Aniyunwiya were called Cherokee by the colonists. They are not Cherokee. They are Aniyunwiya. They are still the Aniyunwiya. Cherokee is also a nom de guerre (war name) for that nation of conquered Americans. Calling them Cherokee was a way for the English to distinguish between different nations of indigenous people, This is how the Five Civilized Tribes, the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole came to be known, as they were the only nations willing to mingle and trade with the colonists, hence the English calling them civilized. Ironically, in time, the colonists proved themselves otherwise Moors, Moorish Americans, and the rest of the indigenous population of Americans who wish to go by their ancestral tribal affiliations are called everything in America but Americans. What Americans Really Looked Like.Note: There is no such thing as a [Native] American. The term is an oxymoron since the American is already a native. There is no other need further distinction, unless one wants to distinguish their origin as to which part of the American continent. In 1772, Samuel Adams wrote The Rights of the Colonists (see below). Adams self-identifies as being a Christian, and a subject of the British Crown, an Englishman... as he is the author of the document. In Article III, The Rights of the Colonists as Subject, Section 3, Adams writes, "All persons born in British American Colonies...", not European. The mentality of the colonists is very apparent and clear... they were English, Not American. These men still considered themselves subjects of the British Crown, much like the Moors being subjects to the Emperor of Morocco, in the Americas (his Dominions). Through this comparison, as the history relates, we can see nationality has always been the order of the day. You can read the complete Rights of the Colonists document here. I think it's time you heard exactly what I am saying from someone European who captures European sentiment perfectly.
Emily Bazelon, a staff writer for the New York Times Magazine, and the Truman Capote Fellow at Yale Law School wrote an article for the magazine titled "White People Are Noticing Something New: Their Own Whiteness" on June 13, 2018. It is a very interesting read, and maybe one that will be able to reach those I can not. Here is the link. And this is where I am going to exit family. I was going to tie in the term Free White Person from a legal perspective, but that is a lesson in itself that is best explained in detail. I will dedicate a post to the subject alone in the future. Giving thanks! Thank you for visiting MoorishMack.org I appreciate you spending your time with me. More to come. See you soon. Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom, and Justice. Islam. M.B. Bey I.S.L.A.M. |
Articles About...
All
In Propia Persona
America is Greater Morocco!
European records "wight" privilege.
The Wild "Wight" Men of Europe.
"Wight" People Are Really Frightened!
An Estate of the Moorish Address: PT#1 By The Aseer The Duke Of Tiers.
Kenneth Copeland Reveals Peru is Jerusalem.
Jeru - Salem. Archives
March 2024
|