I.S.L.A.M.

Have you ever wondered why they call you black? Or what being "black" really means? 

If you haven't... you are about to find out.

MoorishMack.org is dedicated to uplifting fallen humanity. This lesson applies to all "colored" people "black" or "white"... being they are who they are by their own volition... but more specifically geared towards the oppressed Moors... so called "black" people.

Growing up... it was hammered into my head that "black" people were minorities. I always assumed that minority meant less people. It wasn't until I started studying law did I fully comprehend its significance in society.

To illustrate... I took some pictures from my Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Edition Deluxe - unabridged.

We will start with MINORITY... and then the other words within the definition itself to see how they connect.

The state or condition of a minor; infancy. State and condition are words we will look at in a few... but let's focus on MINOR and INFANCY because that is where the true understanding takes place.

An INFANT or person who is under the age of legal competence. This particular section is tricky because they use an infant or... however... if you follow the abstract... it is saying that any person... including an infant is someone under the age of legal competence.

To break that down even further... when you hire a attorney or a lawyer... you have just rendered yourself incompetent to handle your own affairs. It doesn't matter how competent you may be... if you can not stand on your square and represent yourself... in the eyes of the law... you are a minor.

Also... of less consideration; a person of inferior condition. In the "United States"... "black" people are considered those of an inferior condition.

Why? Because so called "black" people are a stateless people with no nation.

The Constitution also did not confer U.S. citizenship to so called "black" people... or anyone with African ancestry or "negro" blood.

Moors however are guaranteed a Republican form of government because we are the architects of the Union. That's a deeper hidden history I will expound on in another post.

Are you starting to get the picture as to how minority and "black" are used at law to designate someone as LEGALLY incompetent? 

Here we see that a infant is also a MINOR... once again showing and proving that the tag MINORITY for so called "black" people has negative political ramifications.... meaning NO STANDING at law.

Now lets look at "Black Person".

Black Person must be taken in a generic sense... as contra-distinguished from "white". So here we see that a "black" person is different from a "white" person... and must be taken in the generic sense... well let's look up contra-distinguish. 

To distinguish by contrasting qualities. So at law... "black" people and "white" people have different qualities.

Now let's look up generic.

Generic means not having a particular brand name...  distinctive quality... or application... i.e. a nationality.

Now let's look up SENSE.

Sense means to have meaning... signification. So a "black" person at law in the generic sense means a person of no significance. Are you following?

Remember... a minority is the state or condition of a minor; infancy. Here we see that state also means the circumstances or condition of a being or thing at a given time.

So if black people are in a perpetual state of inferiority based on the color caste system they CHOOSE to live within... then their STATUS is always that of someone who can't manage their own affairs... and therefore needs an overseer. Sound familiar?

Let's  look up CONDITION.

The RANK, situation ,or degree of a particular person... but focus on an AGREEMENT or STIPULATION.

If you say you are "black"... that's an agreement... a contract... your treatment is based on the stipulations of the agreement/contract. Ask yourself... how are so called "black people treated.

The circumstances are the attendant FACTS! Who you are at any given time determines your status. I am a Moor... but if I operate from a dead status... legally I would fall under the jurisdiction of the agreement and stipulations of being black.

Now you know why they don't want you to have a nationality... because nationality confers HUMAN RIGHTS to people. Colored people are only allowed privileges.

P.E.A.C.E.

Source: Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Edition

Islam.

The "Color Barrier"​ in America... particularly dealing with the "United States" is an American issue. When I say American... I mean the De jure people of the land...  the true heirs... the indigenous Americans... so called "black" people... the Moors.

​It is up to US to abandon the oppressors labels and come back into our true culture.

It is for this very reason that Moorish history has been hidden... and narratives of a so called "black" people even exist... but let's keep it simple... people are NOT colors.

​There is no such thing as "black" or "white" people.

There is no nation/country that so called "black" or "white" people can return to today that connects them to the land, history, or culture.

Black and white are COLORABLE terms used in the "United States" {28 USC § 3002 (15) (A)} ​... and have LEGAL ramifications for those who choose to carry them.

As you can see... from the legal definitions (above)... color is an appearance... an assumed exterior. What that means is color (at law) is deceptive in nature... not real... Prima Facie. 👈🏿

Also look 18 U.S.C. (United States Code) § 241 and 242 for better context. This is United States Code... not mine. 

This is a tiny morsel of the information I could dispense on color. I felt that smaller chunks of information will serve the people better than the whole meal. When you are just waking up... the whole plate can look overwhelming.

If you have any comments to add... or questions.. please feel free to do so. 

​Islam.

The 14th Amendment was never ratified by a Constitutional Congress... so before we get into the language... let's show and prove the unconstitutionality of the 14th Amendment. 

This is the Congressional Record of the 90th Congress, First Session, Volume 113-Part 12... June of 1967.

​We will be reviewing pages 15,641 through 15,646.

I will only be posting excerpts to move things along... but I will post a pdf copy of the pages for you to read in its entirety for yourself. 

PAGE 15,641

PAGE 15,646

unconstitutional_14th_amendment.pdf File Size: 2606 kb File Type: pdf Download File

As you can see since 1967... it has been a known fact by congressional admission that the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional... and that the federal courts refuse to hear argument on the invalidity of the 14th Amendment.

CASE CLOSED!!!

If there are any so called conscious "black" leaders, or scholars that would like to challenge anything that is being presented... please message or email me. You can find my information on the CONTACT page. 

NOW... LET'S DEAL WITH THE LANGUAGE!

The purported 14th Amendment says, "ALL persons BORN or NATURALIZED in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside..."

Interesting choice of words... and they sound good... but that is just part of the deception. We have to always remember that so called negroes, coloreds, and blacks were not counted as a WHOLE human... but 3/5ths of a person up until this point... and that terms like negro, colored, Indian, and black are DESIGNATIONS given to the indigenous American people.

So... even though the 14th Amendment was supposed to end chattel slavery, it never addressed or corrected the colonial COLOR constructs... black and white... which were... and are still being used to liberate one people (Europeans) and subjugate and oppress another (Americans) - so called Indians, negroes, coloreds, and black people in their own land. 

This may not seem apparent now... but I will show you through Plessy vs. Ferguson how the 14th Amendment was placebo.

Now... this is where the true distinction of citizenship is defined in the language of the 14th Amendment.  The 14th goes on to state that "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States..."

We can refer to the DRED SCOTT vs. SANFORD decision of 1857 to get more clarity on this issue.

It was upheld in the Dred Scott vs. Sanford case that "a free {negro} of the African race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, IS NOT A CITIZEN... within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States.

Notice the term negro and African are synonymous in the language. This plays an important part in understanding the theme of the Supreme Court rulings to come. In fact... let's look up the term negro.

So negro means a "black" man, or one descended from the African race. It does not say a black man descended from the African race... it says a black man... COMMA... one descended from the African race.

So... at law... negro means black, black means negro, and negro and black also includes one descended from the African race. The term negro means  NECESSARILY "person of COLOR"...".

Keep in mind that color is the common theme.

​If we know that Americans were not Indians... negro, or colored before the Inquisition... then why are these terms being used when it comes to our emancipation?

Why? Because it keeps the PRIVILEGES and IMMUNITIES of the INTENDED citizens of the United States... "Europeans - so called WHITE people" from being repealed. Always remember... Europeans are not Americans... they are NATURALIZED U.S. citizens claiming to be Americans... and "THEY" passed DE FACTO laws calling themselves Americans.  This was never an agreement the American people afforded Europeans. They simply counted themselves as Americans... while at the same time stripping the real Americans of their nationality by replacing it with COLONIAL DESIGNATIONS. 

In the Dred Scott decision... Chief Justice Taney said that negroes/blacks were not regarded in ANY STATE as members of the State when the Constitution was adopted... and that the founding fathers were well aware that blacks were not counted as "PEOPLE or citizens".

Because of his alleged color... Scott had no rights... and could not sue. Scott was later referred to as a "PLAINTIFF IN ERROR" in the decision for this very reason.

PLESSY vs. FERGUSON known as the "separate but EQUAL doctrine" continues the systematic racism based on color. 39 years after the Supreme Court supposedly made "black" people citizens... they came back and said that even though the 14th Amendment established the LEGAL EQUALITY of so called black and white people... it DID NOT... and COULD NOT eliminate all of the SOCIAL and other DISTINCTIONS based upon COLOR.

So in 1896... the United States openly admitted that COLOR was a racial construct still being used to oppress so called black people. The 14th Amendment truly did nothing because BLACK is a DEAD STATUS at law... and as long as the people referred to themselves as black (self ascribed)... they had no POLITICAL STANDING because to be BLACK is to be STATELESS... without a NATION... because black is COLORABLE CONSTRUCT used to denationalize the indigenous American people.

The current Gregorian Calendar year is 2020. The purported United States is in civil unrest due to its treatment of its so called "black" citizens. Black people are still protesting that BLACK LIVES MATTER... and the majority of the PRIVILEGED class of citizens...  so called "WHITE" people could care less. Racism is as strong as it has ever been... and Europeans are no longer trying to hide it.

A lot of people want to blame Trump. I don't because the United States was built on the same type of ideology that was instilled into him. I can not blame one racist for the actions of group of people that has operated the same way since they stepped foot in America. Trump didn't create racism. Does he energize the racist community? Yes.. but what do you expect when you vote a known racist into office to run a criminally racist regime?

Our people need to wake up... and face the truth about the United States. It was not intended for them... us.... PERIOD. One of my mentors, master teacher, and world historians, Aseer the Duke of Tiers explained it to me best. He said the problem with our people is HUBRIS. We have excessive pride or confidence in something we really don't understand... and to save face... we act like we do... and it is to our own detriment.

The rest of the 14th Amendment states, "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Well... how can this be if so called black people are still denied the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in 2020? It states that every person with the jurisdiction is supposed to be afforded EQUAL PROTECTION of the law. Does the laws today... in 2020 protect so called black people? Do black people receive JUSTICE according to the law? 

Remember... the 14th Amendment states in the beginning that ALL PERSONS born or NATURALIZED within the JURISDICTION of the United States were to be counted as citizens of the United States. So how is it that black people in 2020 are still fighting the same battle as Dred Scott and Homer Plessy?

Think about that. 

Islam.