They Were Never Americans

Webster's: An American Dictionary of the English Language. 1828.

Americans are "a native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or the copper colored [races], found here by Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America".  By definition, anyone not born in America is not a native to America.

The Act of 1870 (Naturalization Act of 1870) is the piece of legislation which allowed the colonists to designate themselves Americans, and the name be applied to all their descendants... even those who emigrated to other countries. Now if the Albion-European, in this case Englishmen, was such an American, why would it take such a specific piece of legislation to grant them a right they don't inherently possess? I'll wait...

I think it's also important to note George Washington's take (highlighted in green) on being American. He said the name American must always exalt the pride of patriotism. Even George Washington had a false sense of nationalism because he was also an Englishmen by descent, but it shows you the transition in thinking as time progresses, which has much to do with the laws and legislation that was passed at the time.

Larry Mitchell Hopkins was arrested Saturday April 20, 2019, by the FBI for posing as a border agent and detaining immigrants. Hopkins is a Trump supporter. He is being called a militia leader in the press, but not a  "white nationalist". He only faces weapons charges and ammunition charges. No kidnapping? Hopkins suffers from a false sense of nationalism. Nationals are born, not naturalized. 

​​​A "White" "National" as it pertains to a "White" "American" is really misnomer. A false sense of nationalism. To understand this better, you must understand the law and the history that goes along with it.

When the Englishmen and Christian colonists came here in the late 16th, early 17th centuries, to the already established America, the continent consisting of North, Central, South, including what is now Canada and Mexico, and the adjoining Atlantic Islands, now the Caribbean Islands, they were not white, had no concept of being white, and they were never Americans.

Before the Mayflower, Lerone Bennett, Jr., page 40.

Play close attention to Bennett's usage of words when he says, "The word white (italicized), with it's burden of arrogance and biological pride,  ​​developed late in the century...". Bennett is hinting of the "White Man's Burden". 

From the English Oxford Dictionary Online

Oxford cleverly promotes this false sense of nationalism by replacing English or Christian with the adjective white before colonizers, and not staying with the language of the times in it's definition. 

The use of European before colonies is another prime example if Oxford disguising the language of the Times. You will see below that the English used the word British American colonies.. not European.

As we can see from the passage in Bennett's book (above) that the legal documents identified {whites} as Englishmen and/or Christians, and you will see below that Englishmen and/or Christians were proud to be such. 

* I put {white} in brackets because at the time Bennett's book was published in 1962, the acceptance of the still foreign Englishmen and/or Christian colonizers as European "white" people (false sense of nationalism) had already been ingrained into the global psyche. We must keep in mind that we are witnessing the "revisionist history" right before our very eyes.

"Imposing Western civilization...", is incriminating evidence and proof of colonization, and "...on the black inhabitants..." is blatant gross misrepresentation of the aboriginal people. Those so called black inhabitants were Americans, and we aren't "black" people as we have been incorrectly classified to be in western civilization.

Those same Americans were also re-branded Indians by Columbus (1492), which can not be because Indians come from India. The Spanish Inquisition nom de guerre (war name) was eventually applied to all the indigenous populations of America, but these people were not Indians. They were conquered Americans. So, we can see Indian is a misnomer as well.

Note: The Mongoloid featured so called "Native" American that is so heavily depicted in revisionist American History as the original Indians are not what the majority of the aboriginal people of America looked like. These people crossed the Bering Strait and entered America  in the early 1100's. They eventually settled the Northwest regions along the Pacific coast of what is now the states of Washington, Oregon, and California. They did intermingle with the indigenous Americans, but they are not originals. The image was switched so that so called black people never discover who they were.

This is also the time, (1492) when Moors became "black" derived from the Spanish word "negro" or "negrito" meaning black... (see the negro connection now)... which is also a misnomer applied to the indigenous Americans, of a dark complexion. They were not "black" people. They were not Christians, negroes, nor Indians. For example, the Aniyunwiya were called Cherokee by the colonists. They are not Cherokee. They are Aniyunwiya. They are still the Aniyunwiya.

Cherokee is also a nom de guerre (war name) for that nation of conquered Americans.  Calling them Cherokee was a way for the English to distinguish between different nations of indigenous people, This is how the Five Civilized Tribes, the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole came to be known, as they were the only nations willing to mingle and trade with the colonists, hence the English calling them civilized. Ironically, in time, the colonists proved themselves otherwise

Moors, Moorish Americans, and the rest of the indigenous population of Americans who wish to go by their ancestral tribal affiliations are called everything in America but Americans. 

What Americans Really Looked Like.

Note: There is no such thing as a [Native] American. The term is an oxymoron since the American is already a native. There is no other need further distinction, unless one wants to distinguish their origin as to which part of the American continent. 

​In 1772, Samuel Adams wrote The Rights of the Colonists (see below). Adams self-identifies as being a Christian, and a subject of the British Crown, an Englishman... as he is the author of the document. In Article III, The Rights of the Colonists as Subject, Section 3, Adams writes, "All persons born in British American Colonies...", not European. 

The mentality of the colonists is very apparent and clear... they were English, Not American.

These men still considered themselves subjects of the British Crown, much like the Moors being subjects to the Emperor of Morocco, in the Americas (his Dominions). Through this comparison, as the history relates, we can see nationality has always been the order of the day. You can read the complete Rights of the Colonists document here.

I think it's time you heard exactly what I am saying from someone European who captures European sentiment perfectly.

Emily Bazelon, a staff writer for the New York Times Magazine, and the Truman Capote Fellow at Yale Law School wrote an article for the magazine titled "White People Are Noticing Something New: Their Own Whiteness" on June 13, 2018. It is a very interesting read, and maybe one that will be able to reach those I can not. Here is the link.

And this is where I am going to exit family. I was going to tie in the term Free White Person from a legal perspective, but that is a lesson in itself that is best explained in detail. I will dedicate a post to the subject alone in the future.

Giving thanks! Thank you for visiting MoorishMack.org I appreciate you spending your time with me. More to come. See you soon.

Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom, and Justice.

Islam.

M.B. Bey

I.S.L.A.M.