*Note: I originally posted this on Instagram. This is just an analysis. You can make up your own mind. Leave your thoughts in the comments. P.E.A.C.E.
*******       *******       *******      *******      ******
​Peace. 

This map was brought to my attention by Aseer the Duke of Tiers.

I went to the CIA website to see it for myself... and noticed it said area comparison map. So I said okay... maybe this isn't what I thought it was... so I looked at the other maps on the same page... and it didn't add up. 🤔

In these slides... you will see the geography of one map didn't match the other two. So I started overlaying the images 👀 and sh*t really didn't add up.

Why doesn't the CIA images add up of the countries? What are they trying to tell us? What did The Duke pick up on?

It seems like regular enough... area comparison... but do you think the CIA would not catch that the Morocco in slide 3 and the Morocco on the map of Africa in slide 5 didn't match?

Did they think people like me would never open up a photo editor to try to line up the images?

The Morocco on the AREA COMPARISON map matches the Morocco on the map of Africa perfectly... but the first map they show of Morocco on the site... slide 3 matches neither. 🤔

Why did they place the overlay with Marrakech, Fès, Rabat, Casablanca and Tangiers so close to Washington D.C.? 

Marrakech would actually be Philadelphia according to Prince Uriel Bey. North and South Dakota was Numidia. 

Morocco was the first Nation to recognize the United States... but the Kingdom of Morocco is over there... the Empire extended to "the farthest or the most extreme West"... the Maghreb Al Aqsa... here.

After the expulsion of the Moors from Al Andalus... many returned here... the Maroons of Xaymaca (Jamaica) .. Moors... etc... under "Spanish" rule... New  Spain.. and New Granada were born in America as a way of erasing the old world's existence and rewriting the history.

We know everything here is also over there... and vice versa. Is it plausible that a Marocco of old was also here... and now its shown as the Morocco of new because its the same thing? 

What's your thoughts? As you can see I like rabbit holes 🕳🤣

The 14th Amendment was never ratified by a Constitutional Congress... so before we get into the language... let's show and prove the unconstitutionality of the 14th Amendment. 

This is the Congressional Record of the 90th Congress, First Session, Volume 113-Part 12... June of 1967.

​We will be reviewing pages 15,641 through 15,646.

I will only be posting excerpts to move things along... but I will post a pdf copy of the pages for you to read in its entirety for yourself. 

PAGE 15,641

PAGE 15,646

unconstitutional_14th_amendment.pdf File Size: 2606 kb File Type: pdf Download File

As you can see since 1967... it has been a known fact by congressional admission that the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional... and that the federal courts refuse to hear argument on the invalidity of the 14th Amendment.

CASE CLOSED!!!

If there are any so called conscious "black" leaders, or scholars that would like to challenge anything that is being presented... please message or email me. You can find my information on the CONTACT page. 

NOW... LET'S DEAL WITH THE LANGUAGE!

The purported 14th Amendment says, "ALL persons BORN or NATURALIZED in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside..."

Interesting choice of words... and they sound good... but that is just part of the deception. We have to always remember that so called negroes, coloreds, and blacks were not counted as a WHOLE human... but 3/5ths of a person up until this point... and that terms like negro, colored, Indian, and black are DESIGNATIONS given to the indigenous American people.

So... even though the 14th Amendment was supposed to end chattel slavery, it never addressed or corrected the colonial COLOR constructs... black and white... which were... and are still being used to liberate one people (Europeans) and subjugate and oppress another (Americans) - so called Indians, negroes, coloreds, and black people in their own land. 

This may not seem apparent now... but I will show you through Plessy vs. Ferguson how the 14th Amendment was placebo.

Now... this is where the true distinction of citizenship is defined in the language of the 14th Amendment.  The 14th goes on to state that "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States..."

We can refer to the DRED SCOTT vs. SANFORD decision of 1857 to get more clarity on this issue.

It was upheld in the Dred Scott vs. Sanford case that "a free {negro} of the African race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, IS NOT A CITIZEN... within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States.

Notice the term negro and African are synonymous in the language. This plays an important part in understanding the theme of the Supreme Court rulings to come. In fact... let's look up the term negro.

So negro means a "black" man, or one descended from the African race. It does not say a black man descended from the African race... it says a black man... COMMA... one descended from the African race.

So... at law... negro means black, black means negro, and negro and black also includes one descended from the African race. The term negro means  NECESSARILY "person of COLOR"...".

Keep in mind that color is the common theme.

​If we know that Americans were not Indians... negro, or colored before the Inquisition... then why are these terms being used when it comes to our emancipation?

Why? Because it keeps the PRIVILEGES and IMMUNITIES of the INTENDED citizens of the United States... "Europeans - so called WHITE people" from being repealed. Always remember... Europeans are not Americans... they are NATURALIZED U.S. citizens claiming to be Americans... and "THEY" passed DE FACTO laws calling themselves Americans.  This was never an agreement the American people afforded Europeans. They simply counted themselves as Americans... while at the same time stripping the real Americans of their nationality by replacing it with COLONIAL DESIGNATIONS. 

In the Dred Scott decision... Chief Justice Taney said that negroes/blacks were not regarded in ANY STATE as members of the State when the Constitution was adopted... and that the founding fathers were well aware that blacks were not counted as "PEOPLE or citizens".

Because of his alleged color... Scott had no rights... and could not sue. Scott was later referred to as a "PLAINTIFF IN ERROR" in the decision for this very reason.

PLESSY vs. FERGUSON known as the "separate but EQUAL doctrine" continues the systematic racism based on color. 39 years after the Supreme Court supposedly made "black" people citizens... they came back and said that even though the 14th Amendment established the LEGAL EQUALITY of so called black and white people... it DID NOT... and COULD NOT eliminate all of the SOCIAL and other DISTINCTIONS based upon COLOR.

So in 1896... the United States openly admitted that COLOR was a racial construct still being used to oppress so called black people. The 14th Amendment truly did nothing because BLACK is a DEAD STATUS at law... and as long as the people referred to themselves as black (self ascribed)... they had no POLITICAL STANDING because to be BLACK is to be STATELESS... without a NATION... because black is COLORABLE CONSTRUCT used to denationalize the indigenous American people.

The current Gregorian Calendar year is 2020. The purported United States is in civil unrest due to its treatment of its so called "black" citizens. Black people are still protesting that BLACK LIVES MATTER... and the majority of the PRIVILEGED class of citizens...  so called "WHITE" people could care less. Racism is as strong as it has ever been... and Europeans are no longer trying to hide it.

A lot of people want to blame Trump. I don't because the United States was built on the same type of ideology that was instilled into him. I can not blame one racist for the actions of group of people that has operated the same way since they stepped foot in America. Trump didn't create racism. Does he energize the racist community? Yes.. but what do you expect when you vote a known racist into office to run a criminally racist regime?

Our people need to wake up... and face the truth about the United States. It was not intended for them... us.... PERIOD. One of my mentors, master teacher, and world historians, Aseer the Duke of Tiers explained it to me best. He said the problem with our people is HUBRIS. We have excessive pride or confidence in something we really don't understand... and to save face... we act like we do... and it is to our own detriment.

The rest of the 14th Amendment states, "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Well... how can this be if so called black people are still denied the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in 2020? It states that every person with the jurisdiction is supposed to be afforded EQUAL PROTECTION of the law. Does the laws today... in 2020 protect so called black people? Do black people receive JUSTICE according to the law? 

Remember... the 14th Amendment states in the beginning that ALL PERSONS born or NATURALIZED within the JURISDICTION of the United States were to be counted as citizens of the United States. So how is it that black people in 2020 are still fighting the same battle as Dred Scott and Homer Plessy?

Think about that. 

Islam.